北極區域 開始 結束 持續時間（年）
（北極時代）（多年前）
北冰洋 7,000？ ？
蘇丹盆地 11,500 7,000 4,500
哈德遜灣 18,500 11,500 7,000
里海 29,000 18,500 10,500
威斯康辛州？ 29,000？
是的，諾亞、亞當和夏娃、歐西里斯、塔羅阿、宙斯和毘濕奴如今有了更深刻的意義；當他們手牽手與我們同行時，我們彷彿聽到亞當和夏娃說：
“聽著——現在我們終於可以真正地和你們分享我們的故事了！”
2026年10月30日星期五
南極冰蓋目前的成長速度約為每年 293 立方英里冰；
- 南美洲最南端火地島原始人流傳的關於太陽逆向落下的傳說；
- 秘魯原始人關於太陽停止轉動的傳說；
- 馬來亞和蘇門答臘土著部落關於漫漫長夜的傳說；
- 明尼蘇達州倫肖爾和新澤西州哈肯薩克的紋泥（地層）數量彼此一致；
- 東方盛產玉石，玉石是地函中的物質，在大災變期間從赤道附近的樞紐點被抬升上來；
- 在一次災難性的事件中，北極西伯利亞、阿拉斯加和南極洲的熱帶植物在短短一天之內被冰封並保存了數千年，這令人驚嘆地證明了它們的存在；
- 世界各地語言的相似性，從波利尼西亞語到希臘語，到埃及語，到瑪雅語，到愛斯基摩語，到雅庫特語，到東方語言等等；
- 恐龍的足跡印在裸露的河泥上，在足跡腐爛之前就被凍結，並保持凍結狀態數千年，使泥印骨化，我們今天才能在岩層中看到恐龍的足跡；
世界各地的故事都在無聲地作證：
- 貝列索夫卡猛獁象，被凍在泥巴裡，嘴裡叼著毛茛花；
- 尼加拉瀑布和聖安東尼瀑布下方的峽谷年齡均為約 7,000 年；
- 大約 11500 年前，加拿大勞倫斯盆地冰蓋突然消失；
加拉巴哥群島持續演化超過11000年；
- 澳洲穆倫比吉河流域系統的地質年代測定表明，那裡的冰蓋大約在 11,500 年前結束；
- 從威爾希爾大道瀝青坑中取出的化石骨骼的年齡超過 11,000 年；
- 11500年前，玻利維亞史前城市蒂亞瓦納科的所有工作突然停止；
- Leonard Woolley 在聖地所進行的偉大工作，將諾亞洪水的時間確定在大約 6000 年前；
- 威斯康辛冰蓋的消亡，約發生在29,000年前；
- 大約7000年前，全球海平面突然上升了200英尺；
We once thought that severe Sun spots could be the cause, because they do disrupt the Earth's inner electrical and magnetic structure, but we were wrong.
The time wasted on that assumption was the price for dealing in assumptions rather than facts. It was a bad detour to take. What was necessary was to be patient, to take more time; to assemble more facts; and use our most valuable tool, analytical reasoning. The solution, whatever it might be, would come.
The derivation of the process gave us a greater understanding of prehistoric events. For instance, you can see that ice ages are not a matter of advancing and retreating ice; it's simply that different areas of the Earth are in polar regions at different times, for different durations of time; changes between positions take place in a fraction of a day, and the accompanying | supersonic deluges deposit the various huge stratas we find in the walls of the Grand Canyon, Painted Desert, Monument Valley, the mountains around Mexican Hat, Canyon de Chelly, and the Moqui Dugway.
目前我們尚不清楚為何每隔幾千年，淺層熔融層中的磁場和電場有序性就會按照不同的時間表發生紊亂。此外，我們也不清楚這種紊亂是如何發生的。必然存在某種機制，能夠降低淺層熔融層的能量，使其能夠像自由液體一樣流動，從而起到潤滑劑的作用，推動冰蓋圍繞地球內部移動，最終使冰蓋向熱帶地區移動約90度。
在短短一刻鐘到半天的時間裡，地理極點移動到了熱帶，一切都將陷入混亂。大氣層、地球的海洋和湖泊不會隨著地殼移動——它們只會繼續自西向東旋轉——在赤道附近，這種旋轉速度約為每小時1037英里。通常情況下，為了每天完成一次自轉，它們必須達到這樣的速度。因此，當地殼隨著極點向赤道移動時，風和海洋繼續向東運動，以超音速席捲全球，淹沒大陸，海水深達數英里，摧毀人類曾經擁有的一切，包括人類自身。以上是整個過程的概述。
那麼，究竟是什麼呢？這成了整個謎題中最難以捉摸的部分。我們不能依賴某種超自然的假設——例如某些模糊的天象，它們實際上違背了自然規律；不，它一定是某種自然現象，是自然界正常結構的一部分，每當災難發生時，它就會擾亂地球內部的電磁結構。它也必須是某種能夠削弱地球內部電磁力的事件，以致於地球內部的電磁力無法維持淺層熔融層像塑性物質或近乎固體的狀態。
最外層厚達 60 英里，為火山爆發的熔岩提供了源源不絕的物質。
地球內部的電磁結構使得各層物質的行為如同近乎固體或塑性一般。只要地球內部的電磁結構保持有序狀態，這顆古老的地球就能繼續以正常的方式繞軸自轉。
如果有人懷疑南極冰蓋是否在增長，那麼事實已經證明，它的增長速度相當於每年一個安大略湖的面積。格陵蘭島的冰蓋也在成長。由於它們並非位於地球自轉軸的中心，因此會產生相互耦合的離心力，方向垂直於地球自轉軸。這就像用繩子甩一桶水一樣。水會留在桶子裡；如果沒有繩子，桶子和水就會飛走。對冰蓋來說，重力就是那根約束繩，它讓這兩個冰蓋被困在陸地上。由於這些冰蓋無法飛走，它們透過試圖將整個地球外殼拉到地球內部60英里厚的熔融層之上來解決這個問題。只要地球內部的電磁結構保持不變，冰蓋就無法拉動外殼使其移動到赤道，我們也因此得以維持有序的每日、每月、每年的自轉。
因此，經過1949年開始的多年研究，居維葉的挑戰終於有了答案：的確，災難會發生；但我尚未找到他挑戰的答案，即這些事件的起因。我又花了二十年才找到災難的起因，也就是觸發因素。是什麼引發了災難？更進一步說，災難發生之後究竟發生了什麼事？災難的過程是怎麼樣的？最後，災難的時間表是什麼？從數據中已經可以明顯看出，它是非線性的。我們能否從數據中推導出某種數學函數？或者，它完全隨機，其不可預測性令人沮喪？學得越多，需要發現和學習的東西就越多。
同時，這真是一場驚心動魄的追尋！我們發現了地球歷史中多麼激動人心的故事：兩萬多年前的文明比我們最狂野的想像還要先進；來自希臘、埃及、印度和南美洲的史前傳說變成了歷史，而非傳說；大西洋和太平洋中消失的大陸變成了確鑿的事實，它們的突然消失也有了合乎邏輯的原因。
是的，毘濕奴復活了：他曾親歷數千年前的一場大災變──確切地說是十次大災變之前！如今，他被尊為印度教中十次從水中復活的神。歐西里斯也被重新發現；他是他那個時代的耶穌──一位生活在約15,000年前的埃及人。諾亞從《吉爾伽美甚史詩》的篇章中向我們微笑；他其實是一位名叫烏特納比什提姆的蘇美人，生活在約7000年前。他建造的方舟不只是一個傳說。
災難性事件的發生過程現在已經為人所知。
看看封面內頁的地球剖面圖。你會看到兩層熔融層——圖中黃色的部分。其中最重要的是較薄的熔融層，它從地表下60英里處開始，向下延伸60英里，直到地表下120英里處。另一層厚而深的熔融層，從地函底部1800英里處開始，向下延伸1300英里，就是外核。地震學已經證實這兩層黃色熔融層都是熔融的，而且溫度極高，超過華氏2500度。
“……猛獁象和野牛被撕裂、扭曲，彷彿是被宇宙之手在神聖的憤怒中撕咬所致。”
「……在阿拉斯加的許多地方，泥漿層中堆滿了動物骨骼和殘骸，像火車車廂一樣多……猛獁象、乳齒象……野牛、馬、狼、熊和獅子……一個動物種群……在一場災難性的浩劫中……突然被凍結……陷入了一場殘酷的鬧劇。」
超自然的狂風；火山爆發；泥漿淹沒和掩埋；動物屍體和泥漿因深度冷凍而得以保存。 “任何對令人費解的謎團的合理解答都必須能夠解釋所有事實。”
希本面臨挑戰。
這個挑戰如影隨形，如飢似渴地啃噬著我的潛意識。我彷彿還能聽到居維葉那深沉的挑戰：“找出這些事件的起因”，它依然在神聖的科學殿堂中迴盪，如同幽靈般，無人應答。我感受到希本的挑戰，它催促著我：“…解答所有事實。”
我決定，這個災難性的概念，這個一次又一次降臨我們星球的災難性結局，需要徹底得到驗證或駁斥。
第一步是收集所有已知且公認的、與地球相關的科學數據，涵蓋地層學、考古學、放射學、人類學、古生物學、海洋學，以及宇宙學、天文學、地震學、海洋學，甚至包括史前瑪雅語等古語言。進化論也不容忽視。此外，各學科間的資料交叉比對也至關重要。上述所有步驟最終得出答案：儘管大多數學科都有足夠的數據表明這些災難確實發生過，但每個學科的數據都不足以推導出災難發生的過程或證明其概念；然而，跨學科的交叉比對卻證實了這一概念的正確性。它不僅驗證了這些事件的發生，還揭示了最近五次災難發生的時間，以及地球外殼在過去35,000年或更長時間中所處的位置。這無疑是一項史無前例的嘗試。
"These alternations now appear to me to form the problem in geology that it is of most importance to solve....in order to solve it satisfactorily, it would be necessary to discover the cause of these events.... These ideas have haunted, I may almost say have tormented me, during my researches among fossil bones...... researches which embrace buta very small part of those phenomena of the age preceding the last general revolution of the globe, and which are yet intimately connected with all the others..."
Many attempts have been made to answer the charge made to the geological profession by Cuvier to explain these sudden revolutions in the wrong direction.
Among others, Velikovsky tried it through his studies of myths and legends; Hapgood tried it; Hugh Brown attempted, and in the process amassed a tremendous library of geological data.
Every time the cataclysmic concept has risen, the "beast" has been stoned, burned at the stake, beaten to a pulp, and buried with a vengeance; but the corpse won't stay dead. Each time, it raises the lid of its coffin and says in sepulchral tones: "You will die before I."
The latest of the challengers is Prof. Frank C. Hibben, who in his book, The Lost Americans*, said: ".....This was no ordinary extinction of a vague geological period which fizzled to an uncertain end. This death was catastrophic and all inclusive....What caused the death of forty million animals.... The "corpus delicti" in this mystery may be found almost anywhere. .... Their bones lie bleaching in the sands of Florida and in the gravels of New Jersey. They weather out of the dry terraces of Texas and protrude from the sticky ooze of the tar pits off Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles.... The bodies of the victims are everywhere....We find literally thousands together....young and old, foal with dam, calf with cow.....The muck pits of Alaska are filled with evidence of universal death....a picture of quick extinction....Any argumentas to the cause....must apply to North America, Siberia, and Europe as well.
THE GREAT FLOODS
Noah? Adam and Eve? Vishnu? Osiris? What do they have in common? They represent eras ages apart - and yet, somehow, they all join hands in the next cataclysm, and walk with us.
There are others who walk with us, too: men of science - long forgotten - those who first saw that these tumbles, these cataclysmic catastrophes, or “revolutions” of the earth's shell have happened before, countless times. J. Andre DeLuc in 1779 and Georges Cuvier in 1812 were the foremost. Dolomieu, the famous mineralogist, joined the consensus, as did Escher and Forel, the Swiss geologists; also J. Andre DeLuc Jr. and Von Buch. They all agreed that the cataclysms were caused by sudden revolutions in the wrong direction by the surface of the earth.
Cuvier, in his Theory of the Earth, first published in 1812, based his conclusions on his unparalleled correlative research in stratigraphy, comparative anatomy, and palaeontology. As a matter of fact, Cuvier was the founder of the science of comparative anatomy, based on his pioneering, self-taught work in that field. At that time he wrote: "Every part of the earth, every hemisphere, every continent, exhibits the same phenomenon....... There has, therefore, been a succession of variations in the economy of organic nature........ the various catastrophes which have disturbed the strata........ have given rise to numerous shiftings of this (continental) basin....It is of much importance to mark, that these repeated irruptions and retreats of the sea have neither been slow nor gradual; on the contrary, most of the catastrophies which occasioned them have been sudden; and this is especially easy to be proved, with regard to the last of these catastrophes....I agree, therefore, with MM. DeLuc and Dolomieu, in thinking, that ifanything in geology be established, it is, that the surface of our globe has undergone a great and sudden revolution, the date of which ....cannot be....much earlier than five or six thousand years ago....(also), one preceding revolution at least had put (the continents) under water....perhaps two or three irruptions of the sea."
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)